Re: [PATCH 7/7] memcg: proportional fair vicitm node selection
From: Hiroyuki Kamezawa <hidden>
Date: 2011-06-23 22:25:22
Also in:
lkml
2011/6/23 Michal Hocko [off-list ref]:
On Thu 23-06-11 23:10:11, Hiroyuki Kamezawa wrote:quoted
2011/6/23 Michal Hocko [off-list ref]:quoted
On Thu 16-06-11 12:57:41, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:quoted
From 4fbd49697456c227c86f1d5b46f2cd2169bf1c5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <redacted> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:25:23 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 7/7] memcg: proportional fair node vicitm selection commit 889976 implements a round-robin scan of numa nodes for LRU scanning of memcg at hitting limit. But, round-robin is not very good. This patch implements a proportionally fair victim selection of nodes rather than round-robin. The logic is fair against each node's weight. Each node's weight is calculated periodically and we build an node's scheduling entity as total_ticket = 0; for_each_node(node) node->ticket_start = total_ticket; node->ticket_end = total_ticket + this_node's_weight() total_ticket = node->ticket_end; Then, each nodes has some amounts of tickets in proportion to its own weight. At selecting victim, a random number is selected and the node which contains the random number in [ticket_start, ticket_end) is selected as vicitm. This is a lottery scheduling algorithm. For quick search of victim, this patch uses bsearch(). Test result: on 8cpu box with 2 nodes. limit memory to be 300MB and run httpd for 4096files/600MB working set. do (normalized) random access by apache-bench and see scan_stat. The test makes 40960 request. and see scan_stat. (Because a httpd thread just use 10% cpu, the number of threads will not be balanced between nodes. Then, file caches will not be balanced between nodes.)Have you also tried to test with balanced nodes? I mean, is there any measurable overhead?Not enough yet. I checked OOM trouble this week :). I may need to make another fake_numa setup + cpuset to measurements.What if you just use NUMA rotor for page cache?
Ok, I'll do try in the next week. Thank you for suggestion. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>