Thread (86 messages) 86 messages, 13 authors, 2011-06-18

Re: REGRESSION: Performance regressions from switching anon_vma->lock to mutex

From: Andi Kleen <hidden>
Date: 2011-06-15 16:19:48
Also in: lkml

Good spot that certainly isn't plain .39.
True.
It looks like those (http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=130533041726258) are
similar to Linus' patch, except Linus takes the hard line that the root
One difference to Linus' patch is that it does batching for both fork+exit.
I suspect Linus' patch could probably too.

But the fork+exit patch only improved things slightly, it's very unlikely to 
recover 52%. Maybe the overall locking here needs to be revisited.

And in general it looks like blind conversion from spinlock to mutex
is a bad idea right now.

-Andi

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help