On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 20:30, Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:

On Tuesday 14 June 2011 18:58:35 Michal Nazarewicz wrote:

quoted

Ah yes, I forgot that separate regions for different purposes could
decrease fragmentation.

That is indeed a good point, but having a good allocator algorithm
could also solve this. I don't know too much about these allocation
algorithms, but there are probably multiple working approaches to this.

imo no allocator algorithm is gonna help if you have comparably large,
variable-sized contiguous allocations out of a restricted address range.
It might work well enough if there are only a few sizes and/or there's
decent headroom. But for really generic workloads this would require
sync objects and eviction callbacks (i.e. what Thomas Hellstrom pushed
with ttm).

So if this is only a requirement on very few platforms and can be
cheaply fixed with multiple cma allocation areas (heck, we have
slabs for the same reasons in the kernel), it might be a sensible
compromise.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch - +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>