On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:09:35 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

I made this static.  If we later wish to give it kernel-wide scope then
"percpu_charge_mutex" will not be a good choice of name.

Thank you.
And, yes..... memcg_cached_charge_mutex ?

I don't see a need to rename the mutex unless we change it to have
kernel-wide scope.  Given that it's presently static to memcontrol.c,
it's obviously part of memcg ;)

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>