Thread (32 messages) 32 messages, 6 authors, 2011-06-09

Re: [PATCH 4/4] writeback: reduce per-bdi dirty threshold ramp up time

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2011-05-24 12:38:38
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml

On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 14:24 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
Again, if we then measure t in the same events as x, such that:

 t = \Sum_i x_i
However, if you start measuring t differently that breaks, and the
result is no longer normalized and thus not suitable as a proportion.
Ah, I made a mistake there, your proposal would keep the above relation
true, but the discrete periods t_i wouldn't be uniform.

So disregard the non normalized criticism.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help