2011/5/3 Minchan Kim [off-list ref]:

On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 7:14 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 01:35:42AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:

quoted

Do you see my old patch? The patch want't incomplet but it's not bad for showing an idea.

                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                              typo : wasn't complete

I think your idea is eligible. Wu's approach may increase throughput but

Yes. it doesn't change many subtle things and make much fair but the
Wu's concern is order-0 pages with __GFP_NORETRY. By his experiment,
my patch doesn't help much his concern.
The problem I have is I don't have any infrastructure for reproducing
his experiment. :(

quoted

may decrease latency. So, do you have a plan to finish the work?

I want it but the day would be after finishing inorder-putback series. :)
Maybe you have a environment(8core system). If you want it, go ahead. :)

Hahaha, no. I lost such ia64 box by physical crash. ;-)
I haven't reproduce his issue yet too.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>