Thread (44 messages) 44 messages, 5 authors, 2011-04-04

Re: [PATCH 00/27] IO-less dirty throttling v6

From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Date: 2011-03-03 20:12:26
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml

On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 02:45:05PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:

[..]
- serve as simple IO controllers: if provide an interface for the user
  to set task_bw directly (by returning the user specified value
  directly at the beginning of dirty_throttle_bandwidth(), plus always
  throttle such tasks even under the background dirty threshold), we get
  a bandwidth based per-task async write IO controller; let the user
  scale up/down the @priority parameter in dirty_throttle_bandwidth(),
  we get a priority based IO controller. It's possible to extend the
  capabilities to the scope of cgroup, too.
Hi Fengguang,

Above simple IO controller capabilities sound interesting and I was
looking at the patch to figure out the details. 

You seem to be mentioning that user can explicitly set the upper rate
limit per task for async IO. Can't really figure that out where is the
interface for setting such upper limits. Can you please point me to that.

Thanks
Vivek

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help