So we rewrite the copy of instruction (stored in XOL) such that it
accesses its memory operand indirectly thro a scratch register.
The contents of the scratch register are stored before singlestep and
restored later.
I see. That should work fine in principle, assuming you use a register
that is not otherwise involved, of course. I hope you arrange to restore
the register if the copied instruction is never run because of a signal or
suchlike. In that case, it's important that the signal context get the
original register and original PC rather than the fiddled state for running
the copy. Likewise, if anyone is inspecting the registers right after the
step.
Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>