Re: [patch] memcg: add oom killer delay
From: Balbir Singh <hidden>
Date: 2011-02-08 10:26:02
* David Rientjes [off-list ref] [2011-02-07 18:37:30]:
On Tue, 8 Feb 2011, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:quoted
And write this fact: A / B / C When A.memory_oom_delay=1sec. B.memory_oom_delay=500msec C.memory_oom_delay=200msec If there are OOM in group C, C's oom_kill will be delayed for 200msec and a task in group C will be killed. If there are OOM in group B, B's oom_kill will be delayed for 200msec and a task in group B or C will be killed. If there are OOM in group A, A's oom_kill will be delayed for 1sec and a task in group A,B or C will be killed. oom_killer in the hierarchy is serialized by lock and happens one-by-one for avoiding a serial kill. So, above delay can be stacked.Ok, I'll add this to the comment that says changing memory.oom_delay_millisecs does so for all children as well that was already added in this version of the patch. I'll wait a couple days to see if Balbir or Daisuke have any additional comments.
The patches look good to me from last time, Kamezawa-San had these comments even last time. I am OK with the changes proposed. -- Three Cheers, Balbir -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>