On 02/26, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
Once again, to me "void __user*" looks better (just simpler). In this
case get_arg_ptr() becomes (without const/__user for the clarity)
void *get_arg_ptr(void **argv, int argc, bool compat)
{
char *ptr;
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
if (unlikely(compat)) {
compat_uptr_t *a = argv;
compat_uptr_t p;
if (get_user(p, a + argc))
return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
return compat_ptr(p);
}
#endif
if (get_user(ptr, argv + argc))
return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
return ptr;
}
Otherwise, get_arg_ptr() should return conditional_user_ptr_t as well,
No, this is not true, I am stupid.
Still,
this looks like the unnecessary complication to me, but of course this
is subjective.
So, what do you think?
Yes, please.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>