Re: [RFC][PATCH] update /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches documentation
From: Dave Hansen <hidden>
Date: 2010-09-15 06:14:28
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 13:53 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
quoted
quoted
============================================================== diff -puN fs/drop_caches.c~update-drop_caches-documentation fs/drop_caches.c--- linux-2.6.git/fs/drop_caches.c~update-drop_caches-documentation 2010-09-14 15:44:29.000000000 -0700 +++ linux-2.6.git-dave/fs/drop_caches.c 2010-09-14 15:58:31.000000000 -0700@@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ int drop_caches_sysctl_handler(ctl_table { proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, length, ppos); if (write) { + WARN_ONCE(1, "kernel caches forcefully dropped, " + "see Documentation/sysctl/vm.txt\n");Documentation updeta seems good but showing warning seems to be meddling to me.Agreed. If the motivation is blog's bogus rumor, this is no effective. I easily imazine they will write "Hey, drop_caches may output strange message, but please ignore it!".
Fair enough. But, is there a point that we _should_ be warning? If someone is doing this every minute, or every hour, something is pretty broken. Should we at least be doing a WARN_ON() so that the TAINT_WARN is set? I'm worried that there are users out there experiencing real problems that aren't reporting it because "workarounds" like this just paper over the issue. -- Dave -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>