Thread (38 messages) 38 messages, 6 authors, 2010-09-02

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Do not wait the full timeout on congestion_wait when there is no congestion

From: Mel Gorman <hidden>
Date: 2010-08-27 09:38:25
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:21:47AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
Minchan,

It's much cleaner to keep the unchanged congestion_wait() and add a
congestion_wait_check() for converting problematic wait sites. The
too_many_isolated() wait is merely a protective mechanism, I won't
bother to improve it at the cost of more code.
This is what I've done. I dropped the patch again and am using
wait_iff_congested(). I left the too_many_isolated() callers as
congestion_wait().

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help