Re: [PATCH 6/6] vmscan: Kick flusher threads to clean pages when reclaim is encountering dirty pages
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Date: 2010-08-02 18:31:10
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Date: 2010-08-02 18:31:10
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
On Sat 31-07-10 11:33:22, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 03:06:01PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:quoted
Sigh. We have sooo many problems with writeback and latency. Read https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12309 and weep.You aren't joking.quoted
Everyone's running away from the issue and here we are adding code to solve some alleged stack-overflow problem which seems to be largely a non-problem, by making changes which may worsen our real problems.As it is, filesystems are beginnning to ignore writeback from direct reclaim - such as xfs and btrfs. I'm lead to believe that ext3 effectively ignores writeback from direct reclaim although I don't have access to code at the moment to double check (am on the road). So either way, we are going to be facing this problem so the VM might as well be aware of it :/
Umm, ext3 should be handling direct reclaim just fine. ext4 does however ignore it when a page does not have block already allocated (which is a common case with delayed allocation). Honza -- Jan Kara [off-list ref] SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>