Re: PTE access rules & abstraction
From: Hugh Dickins <hidden>
Date: 2008-09-24 23:57:17
Also in:
lkml
From: Hugh Dickins <hidden>
Date: 2008-09-24 23:57:17
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Now, regarding the above bug, I'm afraid the only approaches I see that would work would be to have either a ptep_get_and_clear_flush(), which I suppose x86 virt. people will hate, or maybe to actually have a powerpc specific variant of the new start/commit hooks that does the flush.
Whyever not the latter? Jeremy seems to have gifted that to you, for precisely such a purpose. Hugh p.s. I surely agree with you over the name ptep_get_and_clear_full(): horrid, even more confusing than the tlb->fullmm from which it derives its name. I expect I'd agree with you over a lot more too, but please, bugfixes first. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>