On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 11:50:09AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:

Nick Piggin wrote:

quoted

Indeed that would be a good use for it if this general fallback mechanism
were to be merged.

Want me to rebase my virtualizable compound patchset on top of your vmap changes?

Is there much clash between them? Or just the fact that you'll have to
use vm_map_ram/vm_unmap_ram?

I probably wouldn't be able to find time to look at that patchset again
for a while... but anyway, I've been running the vmap rewrite for quite
a while on several different systems and workloads without problems, so
it should be stable enough to test out. And the APIs should not change.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>