Re: [PATCH 0/6] x86: Reduce Memory Usage and Inter-Node message traffic (v2)
From: Andi Kleen <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-25 09:24:49
Also in:
lkml
From: Andi Kleen <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-25 09:24:49
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 05:50:18PM -0700, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 03:26:54PM -0700, travis@sgi.com wrote:quoted
Previous Intro:Thanks for doing this.quoted
In x86_64 and i386 architectures most arrays that are sized using NR_CPUS lay in local memory on node 0. Not only will most (99%?) of the systems not use all the slots in these arrays, particularly when NR_CPUS is increased to accommodate future very high cpu count systems, but a number of cache lines are passed unnecessarily on the system bus when these arrays are referenced by cpus on other nodes.Can we move cpuinfo_x86 also to per cpu area? Though critical run
I worry how much impact that would be? boot_cpu_data is quite widely used.
Wonder if this confusion is the reason for git commit f3fa8ebc
What git commit (full id) ? -Andi -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>