Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm: slub: add knowledge of reserve pages
From: Peter Zijlstra <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-20 09:17:53
Also in:
lkml
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 189 bytes
From: Peter Zijlstra <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-20 09:17:53
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 12:12 +0300, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
Hi Peter, On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:quoted
-static struct page *new_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node) +static struct page *new_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node, int *reserve) {[snip]quoted
+ *reserve = page->reserve;Any reason why the callers that are actually interested in this don't do page->reserve on their own?
because new_slab() destroys the content?
struct page {
...
union {
pgoff_t index; /* Our offset within mapping. */
void *freelist; /* SLUB: freelist req. slab lock */
int reserve; /* page_alloc: page is a reserve page */
atomic_t frag_count; /* skb fragment use count */
};
...
};
static struct page *new_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node, int *reserve)
{
...
*reserve = page->reserve;
...
page->freelist = start;
...
}