Thread (27 messages) 27 messages, 7 authors, 2007-08-06

Re: [rfc] balance-on-fork NUMA placement

From: Ingo Molnar <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-01 06:19:22
Also in: lkml

* Nick Piggin [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
_after_ the dup_task_struct(). Then change sched_fork() to return a 
CPU number - hence we dont have a separate sched_fork_suggest_cpu() 
initialization function, only one, obvious sched_fork() function. 
Agreed?
That puts task struct, kernel stack, thread info on the wrong node.
ok, i missed that - your patch looks then fine to me.

	Ingo

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help