Re: [patch 1/1] alloc_pages(): permit get_zeroed_page(GFP_ATOMIC) from interrupt context
From: Christoph Lameter <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-27 21:32:21
This issue is a result of commit 656dad312fb41ed95ef08325e9df9bece3aacbbb. The intend of moving tests before the check for the highpage was to catch some additional errors. On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:quoted
__GFP_HIGHMEM is not set. : /* : * clear_highpage() will use KM_USER0, so it's a bug to use __GFP_ZERO : * and __GFP_HIGHMEM from hard or soft interrupt context. : */ : VM_BUG_ON((gfp_flags & __GFP_HIGHMEM) && in_interrupt()); __GFP_HIGHMEM is not set : for (i = 0; i < (1 << order); i++) : clear_highpage(page + i); kmap_atomic() goes boom.So the page is not a highmem page. kmap does: void *kmap(struct page *page) { might_sleep(); if (!PageHighMem(page)) return page_address(page); return kmap_high(page); } -> kmap is fine. kmap_atomic() does: void *kmap_atomic_prot(struct page *page, enum km_type type, pgprot_t prot) { enum fixed_addresses idx; unsigned long vaddr; /* even !CONFIG_PREEMPT needs this, for in_atomic in do_page_fault */ pagefault_disable(); idx = type + KM_TYPE_NR*smp_processor_id(); BUG_ON(!pte_none(*(kmap_pte-idx))); if (!PageHighMem(page)) return page_address(page); vaddr = __fix_to_virt(FIX_KMAP_BEGIN + idx); set_pte(kmap_pte-idx, mk_pte(page, prot)); arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode(); return (void*) vaddr; } Move the check for highmem to the beginning of the function? Why should kmap_atomic fail for a non highmem page?
-- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>