Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
From: Ray Lee <hidden>
Date: 2007-07-28 16:30:10
Also in:
lkml
From: Ray Lee <hidden>
Date: 2007-07-28 16:30:10
Also in:
lkml
On 7/28/07, Alan Cox [off-list ref] wrote:
Actual physical disk ops are precious resource and anything that mostly reduces the number will be a win - not to stay swap prefetch is the right answer but accidentally or otherwise there are good reasons it may happen to help. Bigger more linear chunks of writeout/readin is much more important I suspect than swap prefetching.
<nod>. The larger the chunks are that we swap out, the less it actually hurts to swap, which might make all this a moot point. Not all I/O is created equal... Ray -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>