Re: updatedb
From: Tilman Schmidt <hidden>
Date: 2007-07-27 13:32:56
Also in:
lkml
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 250 bytes
From: Tilman Schmidt <hidden>
Date: 2007-07-27 13:32:56
Also in:
lkml
Rene Herman schrieb:
On 07/27/2007 01:48 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:quoted
I believe the users who say their apps really do get paged back in though, so suspect that's not the case.Stopping the bush-circumference beating, I do not. -ck (and gentoo) have this massive Calimero thing going among their users where people are much less interested in technology than in how the nasty big kernel meanies are keeping them down (*).
I think the problem is elsewhere. Users don't say: "My apps get paged back in." They say: "My system is more responsive". They really don't care *why* the reaction to a mouse click that takes three seconds with a mainline kernel is instantaneous with -ck. Nasty big kernel meanies, OTOH, want to understand *why* a patch helps in order to decide whether it is really a good idea to merge it. So you've got a bunch of patches (aka -ck) which visibly improve the overall responsiveness of a desktop system, but apparently no one can conclusively explain why or how they achieve that, and therefore they cannot be merged into mainline. I don't have a solution to that dilemma either. -- Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc Bonn, Germany Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits. Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)