Re: pte_offset_map for ppc assumes HIGHPTE
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: 2007-07-25 23:23:14
Also in:
linuxppc-dev, lkml
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: 2007-07-25 23:23:14
Also in:
linuxppc-dev, lkml
On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 01:18 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Satya [off-list ref] writes:quoted
hello, The implementation of pte_offset_map() for ppc assumes that PTEs are kept in highmem (CONFIG_HIGHPTE). There is only one implmentation of pte_offset_map() as follows (include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h): #define pte_offset_map(dir, addr) \ ((pte_t *) kmap_atomic(pmd_page(*(dir)), KM_PTE0) + pte_index(addr)) Shouldn't this be made conditional according to CONFIG_HIGHPTE is defined or notkmap_atomic is always defined with or without CONFIG_HIGHPTE.quoted
(as implemented in include/asm-i386/pgtable.h) ?I don't think that needs it either.
Depends... if you have CONFIG_HIGHMEM and not CONFIG_HIGHPTE, you are wasting time going through kmap_atomic unnecessarily no ? it will probably not do anything because the PTE page is in lowmem but still... Ben. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>