Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 3 authors, 2007-07-26

Re: pte_offset_map for ppc assumes HIGHPTE

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: 2007-07-25 23:23:14
Also in: linuxppc-dev, lkml

On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 01:18 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Satya [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
hello,
The implementation of pte_offset_map() for ppc assumes that PTEs are
kept in highmem (CONFIG_HIGHPTE). There is only one implmentation of
pte_offset_map() as follows (include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h):

#define pte_offset_map(dir, addr)               \
         ((pte_t *) kmap_atomic(pmd_page(*(dir)), KM_PTE0) + pte_index(addr))

Shouldn't this be made conditional according to CONFIG_HIGHPTE is
defined or not
kmap_atomic is always defined with or without CONFIG_HIGHPTE.
quoted
(as implemented in include/asm-i386/pgtable.h) ?
I don't think that needs it either.
Depends... if you have CONFIG_HIGHMEM and not CONFIG_HIGHPTE, you are wasting
time going through kmap_atomic unnecessarily no ? it will probably not do anything
because the PTE page is in lowmem but still...

Ben.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help