Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans: slub
From: Christoph Lameter <hidden>
Date: 2007-05-02 19:42:55
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
quoted
At some point I dream that SLUB could become the default but I thought this would take at least 6 month or so. If want to force this now then I will certainly have some busy weeks ahead.s/dream/promise/ ;) Six months sounds reasonable - I was kind of hoping for less. Make it default-to-on in 2.6.23-rc1, see how it goes.
Here is how I think the future could develop Cycle SLAB SLUB SLOB SLxB 2.6.22 API fixes Stabilization API fixes Major event: SLUB availability as experimental 2.6.23 API upgrades Perf. Valid. EOL Major events: SLUB performance validation. Switch off experimental (could even be the default) Slab allocators support targeted reclaim for at least one slab cache (dentry?) (vacate/move all objects in a slab) 2.6.24 Earliest EOL Stable - Experiments Major events: SLUB stable. Stable targeted reclaim for all major reclaimable slabs. Maybe experiments with another new allocator? 2.6.25 EOL default - ? Death of SLAB. SLUB default. Hopefully new ideas on the horizon. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>