[PATCH 29/29] balance_dirty_pages() vs throttle_vm_writeout() deadlock
From: Peter Zijlstra <hidden>
Date: 2007-02-21 15:05:47
Also in:
lkml, netdev
If we have a lot of dirty memory and hit the throttle in balance_dirty_pages() we (potentially) generate a lot of writeback and unstable pages, if however during this writeback we need to reclaim a bit, we might hit throttle_vm_writeout(), which might delay us until the combined total of NR_UNSTABLE_NFS + NR_WRITEBACK falls below the dirty limit. However unstable pages don't go away automagickally, they need a push. While balance_dirty_pages() does this push, throttle_vm_writeout() doesn't. So we can sit here ad infintum. Hence I propose to remove the NR_UNSTABLE_NFS count from throttle_vm_writeout(). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <redacted> --- mm/page-writeback.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) Index: linux-2.6-git/mm/page-writeback.c ===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-git.orig/mm/page-writeback.c 2007-02-20 15:07:43.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6-git/mm/page-writeback.c 2007-02-20 16:42:45.000000000 +0100@@ -310,8 +310,7 @@ void throttle_vm_writeout(void) */ dirty_thresh += dirty_thresh / 10; /* wheeee... */ - if (global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS) + - global_page_state(NR_WRITEBACK) <= dirty_thresh) + if (global_page_state(NR_WRITEBACK) <= dirty_thresh) break; congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10); }
--
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>