Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 7 authors, 2006-09-20

Re: [ckrm-tech] [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction

From: Paul Menage <hidden>
Date: 2006-09-20 18:33:33
Also in: lkml

On 9/20/06, Peter Zijlstra [off-list ref] wrote:
Yes, I read that in your patches, I was wondering how the cpuset
approach would handle this.
The VM currently has support for letting vmas define their own memory
policies - so specifying that a file-backed vma gets its memory from a
particular set of memory nodes would accomplish that for the fake-node
approach. The mechanism for setting up the per-file/per-vma policies
would probably involve something originating in struct inode or struct
address_space.

Paul

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help