Re: [ckrm-tech] [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction
From: Paul Menage <hidden>
Date: 2006-09-20 18:33:33
Also in:
lkml
From: Paul Menage <hidden>
Date: 2006-09-20 18:33:33
Also in:
lkml
On 9/20/06, Peter Zijlstra [off-list ref] wrote:
Yes, I read that in your patches, I was wondering how the cpuset approach would handle this.
The VM currently has support for letting vmas define their own memory policies - so specifying that a file-backed vma gets its memory from a particular set of memory nodes would accomplish that for the fake-node approach. The mechanism for setting up the per-file/per-vma policies would probably involve something originating in struct inode or struct address_space. Paul -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>