Re: [PATCH 1/1] network memory allocator.
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2006-08-16 09:40:55
Also in:
lkml, netdev
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2006-08-16 09:40:55
Also in:
lkml, netdev
We could, but I'd rather waste 4 bytes in struct net_device than having such ugly warts in common code.
Why not instead have struct device store some default node value? The node decision will be sub-optimal on non-pci but it won't crash. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>