Re: [PATCH 2.6.13] lockless pagecache 7/7
From: Nick Piggin <hidden>
Date: 2005-09-09 15:23:09
Also in:
lkml
Christoph Lameter wrote:
For Itanium (and I guess also for ppc64 and sparch64) the performance of write_lock/unlock is the same as spin_lock/unlock. There is at least one case where concurrent reads would be allowed without this patch.
Yep, I picked up another one that was easy to make lockless (I'll send out a new patchset soon), however the tagged lookup that was under read lock is changed to a spin lock. It shouldn't be too difficult to make the tag lookups (find_get_pages_tag) lockless, however I just haven't gotten around to looking at the write side of the tagging yet. When that is done, there should be no more read locks at all. Nick -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>