Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 3 authors, 2005-09-15

Re: Hugh's alternate page fault scalability approach on 512p Altix

From: Christoph Lameter <hidden>
Date: 2005-09-07 16:47:03
Also in: lkml

On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
quoted
Anticipatory prefaulting raises the highest fault rate obtainable three-fold
through gang scheduling faults but may allocate some pages to a task that are
not needed.
IIRC that costed more than it saved, at least for forky workloads like a
kernel compile - extra cost in zap_pte_range etc. If things have changed
substantially in that path, I guess we could run the numbers again - has
been a couple of years.
Right. The costs come about through wrong anticipations installing useless 
mappings. The patches that I posted have this feature off by default. Gang 
scheduling can be enabled by modifying a value in /proc. But I guess the 
approach is essentially dead unless others want this feature too. The 
current page fault scalability approach should be fine for a couple of 
years and who knows what direction mmu technology has taken then.







--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help