Re: [PATCH 1/1] Implement shared page tables
From: Hugh Dickins <hidden>
Date: 2005-08-31 13:40:44
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 12:44 +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:quoted
I was going to say, doesn't randomize_va_space take away the rest of the point? But no, it appears "randomize_va_space", as it currently appears in mainline anyway, is somewhat an exaggeration: it just shifts the stack a little, with no effect on the rest of the va space.it also randomizes mmaps
Ah, via PF_RANDOMIZE, yes, thanks: so long as certain conditions are fulfilled - and my RLIM_INFINITY RLIMIT_STACK has been preventing it. And mmaps include shmats: so unless the process specifies non-NULL shmaddr to attach at, it'll choose a randomized address for that too (subject to those various conditions). Which is indeed a further disincentive against shared page tables. Hugh -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>