Re: [RFC][patch 0/2] mm: remove PageReserved
From: Arjan van de Ven <hidden>
Date: 2005-08-09 08:38:58
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 08:08 +0100, Russell King wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 02:59:53PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:quoted
That would work for swsusp, but there are other users that want to know if a struct page is valid ram (eg. ioremap), so in that case swsusp would not be able to mess with the flag.The usage of "valid ram" here is confusing - that's not what PageReserved is all about. It's about valid RAM which is managed by method other than the usual page counting. Non-reserved RAM is also valid RAM, but is managed by the kernel in the usual way. The former is available for remap_pfn_range and ioremap, the latter is not. On the other hand, the validity of an apparant RAM address can only be tested using its pfn with pfn_valid(). Can we straighten out the terminology so it's less confusing please?
and..... can we make a general page_is_ram() function that does what it says? on x86 it can go via the e820 table, other architectures can do whatever they need.... -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>