Re: NUMA policy interface
From: Christoph Lameter <hidden>
Date: 2005-08-04 23:50:35
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:
None of them seem very attractive to me. I would prefer to just not support external accesses keeping things lean and fast.
That is a surprising statement given what we just discussed. Things are not lean and fast but weirdly screwed up. The policy layer is significantly impacted by historical contingencies rather than designed in a clean way. It cannot even deliver the functionality it was designed to deliver (see BIND).
Individual physical page migration is quite different from address space migration.
Address space migration? That is something new in this discussion. So could you explain what you mean by that? I have looked at page migration in a variety of contexts and could not see much difference. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>