Re: [PATCH] gurantee DMA area for alloc_bootmem_low() ver. 2.
From: Dave Hansen <hidden>
Date: 2005-08-10 03:06:34
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 14:15 -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:11:20PM +0900, Yasunori Goto wrote:quoted
I modified the patch which guarantees allocation of DMA area at alloc_bootmem_low().I was going to replace more instances of __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS) with max_dma_physaddr(). However, when grepping for MAX_DMA_ADDRESS I noticed instances of virt_to_phys(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS) as well. Can someone tell me what the differences are between __pa() and virt_to_phys().
At least one is that virt_to_phys()'s argument is usually 'volatile' while __pa() is not. This, of course, varies from arch to arch. If somebody wants to go and rip __pa() out from all of the arches, I won't be especially sorry :) Actually, it would be nice to have one arch-generic version which is just the usual (vaddr - PAGE_OFFSET). That would probably take care of 80% of the individual implementations. -- Dave -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>