Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/6] sparsemem: more separation between NUMA and DISCONTIG
From: Andrew Morton <hidden>
Date: 2005-03-18 23:09:11
Also in:
lkml
From: Andrew Morton <hidden>
Date: 2005-03-18 23:09:11
Also in:
lkml
Dave Hansen [off-list ref] wrote:
There is some confusion with the SPARSEMEM patch between what is needed for DISCONTIG vs. NUMA. For instance, the NODE_DATA() macro needs to be switched on NUMA, but not on FLATMEM. This patch is required if the previous patch is applied.
This patch breaks !CONFIG_NUMA ppc64: include/linux/mmzone.h:387:1: warning: "NODE_DATA" redefined include/asm/mmzone.h:55:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition I'll hack around it for now. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>