Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 2 authors, 2005-03-18

Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/6] sparsemem: more separation between NUMA and DISCONTIG

From: Andrew Morton <hidden>
Date: 2005-03-18 23:09:11
Also in: lkml

Dave Hansen [off-list ref] wrote:
 There is some confusion with the SPARSEMEM patch between what
 is needed for DISCONTIG vs. NUMA.  For instance, the NODE_DATA()
 macro needs to be switched on NUMA, but not on FLATMEM.

 This patch is required if the previous patch is applied.
This patch breaks !CONFIG_NUMA ppc64:

include/linux/mmzone.h:387:1: warning: "NODE_DATA" redefined
include/asm/mmzone.h:55:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition

I'll hack around it for now.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help