Mel Gorman wrote:
quoted
quoted
Now, 5bits per MAX_ORDER pages.
I think it is simpler to use "char[]" for representing type of memory alloc
type than bitmap.
Possibly, but it would also use up that bit more space. That map could be
condensed to 3 bits but would make it that bit (no pun) more complex and
difficult to merge. On the other hand, it would be faster to use a char[]
as it would be an array-index lookup to get a pageblock type rather than a
number of bit operations.
So, it depends on what people know to be better in general because I have
not measured it to know for a fact. Is it better to use char[] and use
array indexes rather than bit operations or is it better to leave it as a
bitmap and condense it later when things have settled down?
Hmm, Okay, I'll wait for condensed version.
BTW, in space consumption/cache view, does using bitmap have real
benefit ?
Thanks
-- Kame [off-list ref]
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>