Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 3 authors, 2005-01-14

Re: page table lock patch V15 [0/7]: overview II

From: Andi Kleen <hidden>
Date: 2005-01-14 10:47:42
Also in: lkml

I have a question for the x86 gurus. We're currently using the lock
prefix for set_64bit. This will lock the bus for the RMW cycle, but
is it a prerequisite for the atomic 64-bit store? Even on UP?
An atomic 64bit store doesn't need a lock prefix. A cmpxchg will
need to though. Note that UP kernels define LOCK to nothing.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help