Re: [patch] CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC_UNSIGNED
From: Andi Kleen <hidden>
Date: 2004-12-17 16:33:08
From: Andi Kleen <hidden>
Date: 2004-12-17 16:33:08
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 08:27:58AM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Andi Kleen wrote:quoted
struct page { page_flags_t flags; /* Atomic flags, some possibly * updated asynchronously */ <------------ what to do with the 4 byte padding here?Put the order of the page there for compound pages instead of having that in index?
That would waste memory on the 64bit architectures that cannot tolerate 32bit atomic flags or on true 32bit architecture. Also what's the problem of having it in index? -Andi -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>