On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 09:47:56AM +0000, Hugh Dickins wrote:

Problematic, yes: don't overlook that GFP_REPEAT and GFP_NOFAIL _can_
fail, returning NULL: when the process is being OOM-killed (PF_MEMDIE).

that looks weird, why that? The oom killer must be robust against a task
not going anyway regardless of this (task can be stuck in nfs or
similar). If a fail path ever existed, __GFP_NOFAIL should not have been
used in the first place. I don't see many valid excuses to use
__GFP_NOFAIL if we can return NULL without the caller running into an
infinite loop.

btw, PF_MEMDIE has always been racy in the way it's being set, so it can
corrupt the p->flags, but the race window is very small to trigger it
(and even if it triggers, it probably wouldn't be fatal). That's why I
don't use PF_MEMDIE in 2.4-aa.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>