On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 05:24:32PM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:

quoted

"Martin J. Bligh" [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

- Making the allocation policy FIFO should drastically increase the chances "hot" pages

 > are handed to the allocator. AFAIK the policy now is LIFO.

 It should definitely have been FIFO to start with

I always intended that it be LIFO.  Take the hottest page, for heavens
sake.  As the oldest page is the one which is most likely to have fallen
out of cache then why a-priori choose it?

Bah. I just had my acronyms backwards ... I meant LIFO, sorry ;-)

I inverted both in the first email, I meant the other way around. Sorry :)
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>