Re: refill_inactive_zone question
From: Martin J. Bligh <hidden>
Date: 2004-08-28 16:43:29
--Hugh Dickins [off-list ref] wrote (on Saturday, August 28, 2004 17:08:23 +0100):
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:quoted
Oh thanks! I see that. So you just dropped the bit spinlocked and changed mapcount to an atomic variable, right?That's it, yes. It needed a little more rework than that (see ChangeLog) but that's the main thrust.quoted
Cool. Do you have any numbers on big SMP systems for that change?Sorry, no. When I sent out the patches a second time to Andrew (didn't copy LKML since nothing really changed from the first time in July), I did CC Martin in the hope that he might feel the urge to run up some numbers (or at least let him be aware of that change lest he misinterpret numbers), but I think he was busy with other stuff.
The lab was down for rewiring, and then I forgot about it - sorry. Can you resend me the patch again, and I'll get off my ass and do something about it? ;-) M. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>