Re: [Lhms-devel] [RFC] buddy allocator without bitmap [2/4]
From: Dave Hansen <hidden>
Date: 2004-08-27 05:31:31
From: Dave Hansen <hidden>
Date: 2004-08-27 05:31:31
On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 22:31, Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA wrote:
I cannot find suitable one, so I test in microbenchmark calling mmap() and munmap(). As you say, real-world workload test is more suitable to measure kernel's performance.
Sorry, I thought you were just running a loop with atomic operations inside of it, not actually exercising the kernel itself. The test you described in your mail to Andrew sounds much more useful than what I thought it was. -- Dave -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>