Re: [Lhms-devel] new memory hotremoval patch
From: Dave Hansen <hidden>
Date: 2004-07-01 00:11:40
Also in:
lkml
From: Dave Hansen <hidden>
Date: 2004-07-01 00:11:40
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 04:17, IWAMOTO Toshihiro wrote:
Due to struct page changes, page->mapping == NULL predicate can no longer be used for detecting cancellation of an anonymous page remapping operation. So the PG_again bit is being used again. It may be still possible to kill the PG_again bit, but the priority is rather low.
But, you reintroduced it everywhere, including file-backed pages, not just for anonymous pages? Why was this necessary? -- Dave -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>