Christoph Hellwig [off-list ref] wrote:

On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 03:32:34PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:

quoted

quoted

Yes.  We've traditionally not exported symbols unless we had an intree user,
and especially not if it's for a module that's not GPL licensed.

That's certainly a good rule of thumb and we (and I) have used it before.

What is the reasoning behind it?

The reason is that someone who wants to distribute a binary only module
has to show it's module is not a derived work, and someone who needs new
core in the kernel and new exports pretty much shows his work is deeply
integrated with the kernel.

Needing access to invalidate_mmap_range() is surely not an indication of a
derived work.  It is an indication of a need for a reliable way to achieve
inter-node cache consistency.  Other distributed filesystems will need this
and probably AIX already provides it.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>