Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 4 authors, 2004-02-20

Re: Non-GPL export of invalidate_mmap_range

From: Andrew Morton <hidden>
Date: 2004-02-18 23:33:41
Also in: lkml

Christoph Hellwig [off-list ref] wrote:
Yes.  Andrew, please read the GPL, it's very clear about derived works.
Then please tell me why you think gpfs is not a derived work.
I haven't seen the code.
quoted
But at the end of the day, if we decide to not export this symbol, we owe
Paul a good, solid reason, yes?
Yes.  We've traditionally not exported symbols unless we had an intree user,
and especially not if it's for a module that's not GPL licensed.
That's certainly a good rule of thumb and we (and I) have used it before.

What is the reasoning behind it?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help