Re: 2.6.3-rc3-mm1

On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Bill Davidsen wrote:

quoted

I think it was a good change, and was appropriate to 2.5.x.  But for 2.6.x
the benefit didn't seem to justify the depth of the change.

Rather unfortunate that allyes didn't fix things.

And will it be appropriate for 2.7? It really does give a start to
trimming code you don't want in a small kernel, and would have been nice
so people could use it for any processor specific additions to 2.6.

Not arguing, but it was a step to improve control of creeping unnecessary
archetecture support.

Well the -tiny tree has that and a lot more drastic trimmings, Andrew is
there already an arrangement to feed the not so brutal changes to you?

	Zwane
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>