Re: VM patches (please review)
From: Bill Davidsen <hidden>
Date: 2004-02-05 01:04:15
Also in:
lkml
Rik van Riel wrote:
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Bill Davidsen wrote:quoted
Since this is broken down nicely, a line or two about what each patch does or doesn't address would be useful. In particular, having just gotten a working RSS I'm suspicious of the patch named vm-no-rss-limit being desirable ;-)The bug with the RSS limit patch is that I forgot to change the exec() code, so when init is exec()d it gets an RSS limit of zero, which is inherited by all its children --> always over the RSS limit, no page aging, etc. I need to find the cleanest way to add the inheriting of RSS limit at exec time and send a patchlet for that to akpm...
Thank you! I had assumed that the info was being carried through exec, fork, and pthread_* and similar, and just not enforced. I still think this will be great for those applications known to occasionally get a tough data set and not converge or recurse beyond all sense. -- bill davidsen [off-list ref] CTO TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>