Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 4 authors, 2004-02-04

Re: [BENCHMARKS] 2.6 kbuild results (with add_to_swap patch)

From: Nick Piggin <hidden>
Date: 2004-01-31 01:19:37

Rik van Riel wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Nick Piggin wrote:

quoted
Small big significantly better on kbuild when tested on top of the other
two patches (dont-rotate-active-list and my mapped-fair).
Where can I grab those ?
I've put the all here for now.
They are against the latest mm with the RSS patch backed out.

http://kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/vm/
quoted
With this patch as well, we are now as good or better than 2.4 on
medium and heavy swapping kbuilds and much better than stock 2.6
with light swapping loads (not as good as 2.4 but close).

http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/vm/3/
Neat!  Does it have any side effects to interactive
desktop behaviour ?
To be honest I haven't tried them on my desktop. I would guess
they should be fine.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help