Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 3 authors, 2003-09-18

Re: __vmalloc and alloc_page

From: Leandro Motta Barros <hidden>
Date: 2003-09-18 16:20:08

On Wednesday 17 September 2003 16:32, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
Higher-order would probably not be as useful as you'd suspect; try
looking at the distribution of available pages of given sizes in /proc/.
OTOH, just being able to get more than one page in one call (not relying
on physically contiguous memory) would be a simple and useful optimization.

I'm not sure if I really understood what you said. Does it means that in some 
cases (e.g., when the buddy allocator has a free chunk of the proper size) 
this could be good, even though this will not help other things (like 
reducing the number of splits in the buddy allocator)?

LMB

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help