On Thu, 2003-05-15 at 16:17, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
no, the spin_lock only acts as a barrier in one way, not both ways, so
an smp_something is still needed.
Can you explain this more? On a x86, isn't a spin_lock a lock; dec
instruction and the rmb() a lock; addl. I thought x86 instructions
with lock prefix provided a memory barrier.
Just curious,
--
Daniel McNeil [off-list ref]
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>