Re: Rising io_load results Re: 2.5.63-mm1
From: Andrew Morton <hidden>
Date: 2003-02-27 22:23:44
Also in:
lkml
Dave McCracken [off-list ref] wrote:
--On Thursday, February 27, 2003 13:44:03 -0800 Andrew Morton [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
... Mapped: 4294923652 kBWell that's gotta hurt. This metric is used in making writeback decisions. Probably the objrmap patch.Oops. You're right. Here's a patch to fix it.
Thanks. I'm just looking at page_mapped(). It is now implicitly assuming that the architecture's representation of a zero-count atomic_t is all-bits-zero. This is not true on sparc32 if some other CPU is in the middle of an atomic_foo() against that counter. Maybe the assumption is false on other architectures too. So page_mapped() really should be performing an atomic_read() if that is appropriate to the particular page. I guess this involves testing page->mapping. Which is stable only when the page is locked or mapping->page_lock is held. It appears that all page_mapped() callers are inside lock_page() at present, so a quick audit and addition of a comment would be appropriate there please. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>