Thread (28 messages) 28 messages, 11 authors, 2003-01-26

Re: 2.5.59-mm5

From: Alex Tomas <hidden>
Date: 2003-01-24 12:05:55
Also in: lkml

quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Andrew Morton (AM) writes:
 AM> That's correct.  Reads are usually synchronous and writes are
 AM> rarely synchronous.

 AM> The most common place where the kernel forces a user process to
 AM> wait on completion of a write is actually in unlink (truncate,
 AM> really).  Because truncate must wait for in-progress I/O to
 AM> complete before allowing the filesystem to free (and potentially
 AM> reuse) the affected blocks.

looks like I miss something here.

why do wait for write completion in truncate? 

getblk (blockmap);
getblk (bitmap);
set 0 in blockmap->b_data[N];
mark_buffer_dirty (blockmap);
clear_bit (N, &bitmap);
mark_buffer_dirty (bitmap);

isn't that enough?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help